Proceedings - WM '99 - WM Symposia, Inc.

				.
Proceedings				.
Tuesday AM 3/2/99

9:30:00 AM SESSION 23 Exhibit Hall A,B,C

Poster - ER

Cochairs:
S.J. Parkinson, NUKEM Nuclear Technologies
David Mathes, USDOE

1	The TechCon Approach toTechnical Assistance: Linking Public and Private Sector Technical Resources in Support of DOE Site Environmental Remediation Needs D. Pflug, P. Horstman, C. Swanstrom, B. Gasper, D. Gerrick, M. Krstich, Argonne National Laboratory (USA)
2	Recovery of High Value Fluorine Products From Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion J.B. Bulko, D.S. Schlier, Starmet Corporation (USA)
3	Application of a New In Situ Vitrification Technology for the Remediation of Underground Storage Tanks R.K. Farnsworth, D.J. Kuhns, D.L. Michael, Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Co.; J.E. Hansen, P.S. Lowery, Geosafe Corp. (USA)
4	A Study of Dioxin and Furan Formation Using Hot Filtration for Offgas Treatment J.L. Montgomery, S.V. Babko-Malyi, C.G. Whitworth, S.E. Johnson, D.M. Battleson, MSE Technology Applications, Inc. (USA)
5	Optimization of the Soil Mixing/Thermally Enhanced Soil Vapor Extraction Process by Zero-Valent Iron Addition L. Moos, R. Swale, P. Lynch , Argonne National Laboratory; R. Murray, P. LaMori , C. Siatras, In-Situ Fixation Inc. (USA)
6	Biodegradation of Used Machine Tool Cutting Fluids M.J.H. Keep, N.D. Knee, G.T. Taylor, D. Lowe and V.C. M. Freestone, AWE plc (UK)
7	Software for Environmental, Safety and Health Management - To Build or Buy? S. Harter, L. Pitts, Radian International Software (USA)
8	Determining the Performance of an Arid Zone Radioactive Waste Site Through Site Characterization, Modeling and Monitoring D.G. Levitt, M.J. Sully, B.L. Dozier, C.F. Lohrstorfer, Bechtel Nevada (USA)
9	Real-Time Broad Spectrum Characterization of Waste by Membrane Introduction Mass Spectrometry: Preliminary Results T.M. Allen, M.E. Cisper, C.N. Wilkerson, Jr., Los Alamos National Laboratory (USA)
10	Application of Automated Positioning During the Survey Process R.G. Handy, Western Kentucky University; M.D. Lafreniere, Ohio University (USA)
11	Vapor Extraction Voluntary Corrective Measure at the Chemical Waste Landfill, Sandia National Laboratories/New Mexico J.E. Studer, L. Brouillard, C. Ardito, Duke Engineering and Services; R.E. Fate, Sandia National Laboratories (USA)
12	MULTISCANTM- – In-Situ, Real-Time, Automated Detection and Monitoring of Subsurface Volatile Organic Compounds V. Chipman, S. Dalvit Dunn, B. Lowry, Science and Engineering Associates (USA)
13	A Strategic Framework for A Cost-Effective Ground Water Compliance Program P. Beam, D. Metzler, USDOE (USA)
14	Microbial Characterization for the Source-Term Waste Test Program (STTP) at Los Alamos P.A. Leonard, B.A. Strietelmeier, L. Pansoy-Hjelvik, R. Villarreal, Los Alamos National Laboratory (USA)
15	Long Term Behavior of Radioactive Waste Material in the Near-Field of a Deep Geological Disposal Mock-up Experiments P. Locoge, CEA (FRANCE)
16	Installation of Horizontal Wells for Groundwater Extraction J. Carelli, Brookhaven National Laboratory; A. Lowe, A & L Underground, Inc.; N. C. Pressly, Pressly Associates, Inc. (USA)
17	Groundwater Remediation - Passive Reactive Barrier D. Drucker, N. Castaneda, USDOE; L. Butler, Kaiser-Hill; A. Primrose, Rocky Mountain Remediation Services; T. Holdsworth, EPA (USA)
18	Lessons Learned from the 20-Year Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action Surface Project D. Mathes, USDOE (USA)
19	Evaluating and Communicating Geographic Patterns in Radiation Illnesses R.M. Jones, Medical University of South Carolina (USA)
20	FUSRAP Cost to Complete K. Peterson, R. Osborn, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USA)
21	Employees - The Forgotten Stakeholders: Communication Fact-Finding Triggers Management Action C. Hundertmark, J. Hoopes, Kaiser-Hill Company, LLC (USA)
22	Extrapolation Studies on Adsorption of Thorium and Uranium at Different Solution Compositions on Soil Sediments S.H. Sakuma, Malaysian Institute for Nuclear Technology Research (MINT) (MALAYSIA)
23	Geological-and-hydrogeological Conditions of SIA "Radon" Storage Sites in the Russian Federation L.B. Prozorov, A.V. Gouskov, S.L. Speshilov, A.V. Tkachenko, S. Korneva SIA "Radon" (RUSSIA)
24	Strontium-85 and Plutonium–239 Sorption by Rocks from the Semipalatinsk Test Site, Kazakhstan C.F.V. Mason, N.L. Marusak, N. Lu, S. Chipera, LANL; D. Daukeyev, I. Khromushin, National Nuclear Center of the Republic of Kazahkstan (USA/KAZAKHSTAN)
25	Interpolyelectrolyte Complexes as a Barrier to Radionuclide Migration within Soil S.V. Mikheikin, P.G. Ogulnik, A.Yu. Smirnov, M. R. Petrov, VNIINM (RUSSIA)
26	Hydraulic Investigation of the Excavation Disturbed Zone Around Drifts in Rock Salt K. Wieczorek, J. Droste, U. Zimmer, Gesellschaft fur Anlagen-und Reaktorsicherheit (GRS) (GERMANY)
27	Dispersion of 85Sr in Unsaturated Loess Medium Z.M. Wang, S.S. Li, Z.D. Guo, Y.J. Zhao, Z.T. Li, China Institute for Radiation Protection (PR CHINA)
28	Studying the Migration Behavior of Yb as Actinides Simulator of Spent Fuel Wastes in Natural Granite Rock S. Yu. Sayenko, N.P. Dikiy, A.N. Dovbnya, V.P. Kantsedal, E.P. Medvedeva, R.V. Tarasov, V.L. Uvarov, Kharkov Institute of Physics & Technology (UKRAINE)
29	Determination of the Mass Transfer Parameters from Field Test Results on Saratov Site L.B. Prozorov, A.V. Gouskov, S.L. Speshilov, S.A. Korneva, SIA "Radon" (RUSSIA)
30	Potential Preferential Flow Paths in the Vadose Zone at Hanford and Their Importance to Tank Waste Retrieval and Closure P.M. Rogers, Jacobs Engineering Group; R.W. Lober, USDOE (USA)
31	Performance of Alternative Engineered Covers-- Results of 12 years of Cover Performance in Lysimeters at a Humid Region Site, Beltsville, Maryland E. O'Donnell, USNRC; J. Philip, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission; Peter Godwin, Consultant (USA)
32	Innovative Radiation Contamination Controls in Rapid Site Assessments W. Schaal, K.J. O'Leary, D. Brown, IT Corporation (USA)
34	Oak Ridge National Laboratory Tank Remediation Project: Successful Remediation of 25 Low-Level Radioactive Waste Tanks A. Brill, The Providence Group; R. Clark, Bechtel Jacobs Company; S. Rudell, Lockheed Martin Energy Research (USA)
35	Preventing Waste - Supporting Cleanup: Pollution Prevention Used in Conjunction with CERCLA Activities at Bear Creek Valley, Oak Ridge Reservation, Oak Ridge, TN K.P. Catlett, USDOE; L.W. Manis, DPRA Inc.; S.P. Kucera, Bechtel Jacobs Company, LLC; P.D. Moss, Science Applications International Corporation (USA)
36	Remediation of an UMTRA Vicinity Property Containing Mixed Waste J.E. Elmer, IT Corporation, (USA)
37	Reclamation and Contained Disposal of Previously Processed Mine Tailings B. Atkinson, H. Chuong, M. Gleason D. Hamlin, S. Mitchem, J. Watson, University of Arkansas (USA)
38	Taming a Large Solvent Plume: Progress at the Savannah River Site in Remediating Groundwater C. Bergren, N. Lawrence, M. Simmons, Westinghouse Savannah River Co. (USA)
39	Remediation of More than 100,000 Gallons of Free-Product Creosote Through Thermal Remediation: The Visalia Pole Yard Cleanup Example R.D. Aines, R.L. Newmark, LLNL; C.L. Eaker, R.S. Weidner, Southern California Edison Co. (USA)
40	RCRA Closure Of Materials Disposal Area P, Los Alamos New Mexico C.W. Criswell, Roy F. Weston Inc.; K.V. Bostick, R. Romero, Los Alamos National Laboratory (USA)
41	Remediation of Contaminated Forest Through Biomass Valorization and Relevant Risk A. Grebenkov, V. Rimkevitch, V. Goulo, A. Andrezhievsky, Institute of Power Engineering Problems (BELARUS)
42	Integration Point Assessment Provides a Decision Tool for Implementing a Remediation Strategy at Bear Creek Valley at the Oak Ridge Reservation, Oak Ridge, Tennessee S.P. Kucera, Bechtel Jacobs Company, LLC; K.P. Catlett, D.G. Adler, USDOE; P.D. Moss, SAIC (USA)
43	Elimination of Hazardous Elements and Compounds from the ISL Uranium Mining in the Czech Republic J. Slovak, P. Franta, Nuclear Research Institute (CZECH REPUBLIC)
44	A Review of Bioremediation Technologies for Uranium Mill Tailings M. O'Shaughnessy, USDOE; D.F. Freedman , T.A. DeVol, Clemson University (USA)
45	Hydrogen Permeability Through Taped and Untapped "Clamshell" Containers Used at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site T. Wickland, Nuclear Filter Technology, LLC; D. Dustin, Safe Sites of Colorado (USA)

Tuesday AM 3/2/99

8:30:00 AM SESSION 24 Graham Rm.

Challenges in Terminating Safeguards for Special Nuclear Materials (Panel)

Cochairs:
Randall Erickson, Los Alamos National Laboratory
Leonard Gray, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

This panel discussion on termination of safeguards for special nuclear materials (relative to excess and waste materials) will discuss drivers and impacts of safeguards termination limits. The panel represents a wide range of interests on safeguards and safeguards termination limits, and would include a short presentation by each member followed by a panel discussion and questions. The session will be approximately two hours duration. Panelists will represent ACTA, DOE, and others. For more information, please contact: Dr. Randall M. Erickson, Los Alamos National Laboratory, V-(505)667-4950, F-(505)665-8997, E-mail: rerickson@lanl.gov

1	The Successful 1998 Certification of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Tranuranic Waste Repository - Ten Important Lessons Learned M.H. Mc Fadden, USDOE; L. Eriksson, GRAM, Inc.; (USA)
4	Safety In Salt -- A WIPP Operator's Viewpoint James L. Gallagher, Westinghouse Government Services Company (USA)

Tuesday AM 3/2/99

8:30:00 AM SESSION 25 Greenlee Rm.

Mixed Waste Technology Deployment

Cochairs:
Jeffrey Walker, USDOE
Jay Roach, INEEL-LMITCO


1	The DOE EM Science and Technology Program Vision – An Overview J. Walker USDOE; J. Roach, LMITCO (USA)
2	Incorporating the DOE-EM Vision into the Mixed Waste Program – A Balanced Portfolio W. Owca, USDOE; J. Roach, LMITCO (USA)
3	Successful Mixed Waste Deployments through Technology Transfers – Past, Present, and Future J. Roach, LMITCO (USA)
4	Providing Industry Solutions to DOE's Mixed Waste Remediation Efforts R. C. Bedick, S. P. Cooke, C. Carpenter, USDOE (USA)
5	Environmental Management Integration/Mixed Waste Focus Area Partnerships K. Kristofferson, L. Cole, D. Gombert, III, Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Co. (USA)
6	Development of an Efficient and Cost Effective Approach for the Remediation of Numerous Mixed Waste Streams J. Kulpa, RMIES (USA)
7	Extending the Chemical Analysis Automation (CAA) Technology into the Mixed-Waste Analytical Market D. Dale, Los Alamos National Laboratory (USA)
8	Mercury Bakeoff: Technology Comparison for the Treatment of Mixed Waste Mercury Contaminated Soils at BNL P.D. Kalb, J.W. Adams, L.W. Milian, Brookhaven National Laboratory; G. Penny, USDOE; J. Brower, Brookhaven National Laboratory; A. Lockwood, CDM Federal Programs Corp. (USA)

Tuesday AM 3/2/99

8:30:00 AM SESSION 26 Maricopa Rm.

Global Perspectives III

Cochairs:
Mark Matthews, USDOE
George Dials, ICF Kaiser International, Inc.


1	Recent Developments in the United Kingdom Programme for the Deep Disposal of Radioactive Waste J. Holmes, J. Mathieson, UK Nirex Ltd (UK)
2	Realization of the German Repository Concept - Current Status and Future Prospects P.W. Brennecke, H. Röthemeyer, B. R. Thomauske, Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz (BfS) (GERMANY)
3	Changing of Hungarian Infrastructure in Waste Management - A Step Forward P. Ormai, Public Agency for Radioactive Waste Management (HUNGARY)
4	The Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project R. Dyer, USDOE (USA)
5	Radioactive Waste Storage Technologies in the Arctic for the Russian Navy A. Griffith, USDOE; T. Engrøy, Norwegian Defense Research Establishment; A. Diashev, Russian Navy; P.R. Schwab, A. Nazarian, A. Ustyuzhanin, SAIC; P. Moskowitz, M. Cowgill, Brookhaven National Laboratory (USA/NORWAY/RUSSIA)
6	Progress in Low- and Intermediate-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal in China Q. Zhimin, Everclean Environmental Engineering Corp., CNNC (CHINA)
7	Canada's Policy Approach to Nuclear Fuel Waste Management and Disposal G. Underdown, P. Brown, Natural Resources Canada (CANADA)
8	The Regulatory Role of the Hungarian Geological Survey in Radioactive Waste Management T. Hámor, G. Rezessy, Hungarian Geological Survey (HUNGARY)

Tuesday AM 3/2/99

8:30:00 AM SESSION 27 Mohave Rm.

NORM - Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials - Regulation and Management

Cochairs:
Manfred Sappok, Siempelkamp
Shankar Menon, Menon Consulting AB

1	NORM II - Results of the Second International Symposium M. Sappok, Siempelkamp Nuklear-und Umwelttechnik GmbH & Co. (GERMANY)
2	The Regulation of NORM from a Nuclear Decommissioner's Viewpoint S. Menon, Menon Consulting AB (SWEDEN)
3	Approaches for Management of Large Volumes Containing Natural Radionuclides in Enhanced Concentrations L.C. Scholten, J. Vander Steen, KEMA (THE NETHERLANDS)
4	Melting of NORM -- Contaminated Equipment of an Offshore Oil Platform M. Sappok, U. Quade, T. Kluth, Siempelkamp Nuklear-und Umwelttechnik GmbH & Co. (GERMANY)
5	Offshore Dismantling and Decontamination of LSA Contaminated Production Installations C.S.P. de Haan, H. de Vries, Amersfoort; R.J.P. Bart, A.M. Bloot, O.A.D.M. van Dongen, J.F.M. van Heijningen, R.G.C. Janssen, R. van Sonsbeek, RTD bv (THE NETHERLANDS)
6	Cost/Benefit Analysis as Basis for Decision-Making in Environmental Restoration W. Goldammer, BRENK SYSTEMPLANUNG (GERMANY)
7	Handling and Disposal of NORM in the Oil and Gas Industry T. Strand, I. Lysebo, Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority (NORWAY)
8	Regulatory Intiatives for Control and Release of Technologically Enhanced Naturally Occuring Radioactive Material P.V. Egidi, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (USA)

Tuesday AM 3/2/99

8:30:00 AM SESSION 28 Copper Rm.

Promoting Use of Effective Science & Technology Using Performance Measures (PANEL)

Cochairs:
Jean E. Shorett, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Edgar Berkey, Concurrent Technologies Corporation

1	Defining the Purpose of the Office of Science and Technology (OST) through Performance Measures D. H. Cates, House Committee on Commerce (USA)
2	Developing Performance Measures for Science & Technology P. Longsworth, Senate Armed Services Committee (USA)
3	Developing Effective Performance Measures J.E. Shorett, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (USA)
4	Developing Performance Measures for the Environmental Management Program D.M. Berkovitz, J. S. Arcidiacono, USDOE (USA)
5	Evaluating Science and Technology for Managing DOE Waste M.W. Frei, E.I. Rizkalla, J.A. Coleman, USDOE (USA)
6	Furthering Environmental Restoration By Using Performance Measures J.J. Fiore, USDOE (USA)
7	The Environmental Management Program Uses Performance Measures for Science and Technology to:Focus Investments On Achieving Cleanup Goals; Improve The Management of Science and Technology; and Evaluate the Effectiveness of Those Investments G. G. Boyd,T. D. Anderson, D. W. Geiser; USDOE (USA)
8	Performance Measurements in the Office of Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization and Their Dependency on Science and Technology D. Huizenga, L. Wade, M. Bisesi; USDOE (USA)
9	Performance Measurement for Technology Deployment at the Savannah River Site T. F. Heenan, USDOE (USA)
10	Measurements of Strategic Investments R.M. Rosselli, USDOE (USA)

Tuesday AM 3/2/99

8:30:00 AM SESSION 29 Gila Rm.

Groundwater & Soil Remediation

Cochairs:
David R. Lee, AECL

1	Experience With the Application of CHEMICTM Technology for the Treatment of Ground/Surface Waters Containing Radiostrontium S. Vijayan, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (CANADA)
2	GeoSiphon/GeoFlow Treatment System M. Phifer, SRTC; N. Ellis, USDOE; J. Cardoso-Neto, BSRI (USA)
3	Development and Operation of a Passive-Flow Treatment System For Sr-90 Contaminated Ground P. Taylor, P. Kirkham, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (USA)
4	Treatability Study: Acid Pit Stabilization at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory G.G. Loomis, J.J. Jessmore, Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Co. (USA)
5	Frozen Soil Barrier Demonstration Project E. Yarmak, Jr., Arctic Foundations, Inc.; E.C. Phillips, USDOE (USA)
6	Environmental Remediation Decision-Making for Bear Creek Valley at the U.S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge Reservation is Facilitated Under a Watershed Approach D.G. Adler, K.P. Catlett, USDOE; S.P. Kucera, Bechtel Jacobs Company, LLC; P.D. Moss, SAIC (USA)
7	Verification of Subsurface Barrier Installations with the Seatrace Gaseous Tracer System S. Dalvit Dunn, V. Chipman, B. Lowry, Science and Engineering Associates (USA)
8	CONE PERMEAMETERTM- In-Situ Permeability Measurements with Direct Push Techniques B. Lowry, N. Mason, V. Chipman, Science and Engineering Associates (USA)

Tuesday AM 3/2/99

8:30:00 AM SESSION 30 Crystal Rm.

U.S. Department of Energy Decontamination and Decommissioning Technology Deployment Programs

Cochairs:
Steven Bossart, USDOE
Jerry White, Bechtel Hanford, Inc.

1	Innovative & Improved D&D Technologies to Meet Department of Energy's Accelerating Cleanup and Paths to Closure J.M. Hyde, USDOE (USA)
2	Life after Large-Scale Technology Demonstrations S.J. Bossart, J.R. Duda, USDOE; W. Lupichuk, SAIC (USA)
3	Technology Demonstrations and Deployments at the INEEL D. Meservey, A. M. Smith, L. Whitmill, LMITCO (USA)
4	Shutting Down the Mound-Accelerating the D&D of the Mound Plant Tritium Facilities Utilizing the DOE D&D Large Scale Demonstration and Deployment Project M. Mintz, LLNL; D. Krause, B&W Services Inc.; D. Blauvelt, Waste Policy Institute; J. Johnson, USDOE (USA)
5	Large Scale Demonstration and Deployment Project at Los Alamos National Laboratory S. Brown, IT Corporation; C. Broom, Florida International University; H. Dugger, ICF Incorporated; J. McFee, IT Corporation; E. Stallings, Los Alamos National Laboratory (USA)
6	Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site 1998 Accelerated Site Technology Deployment Program D. Santi, Rocky Mountian Remediation Services (USA)
7	Application of New and Innovative Technologies on the 321-M Fuel Fabrication Facility Large Scale Demonstration & Deployment Project J.W. Lee, M. Ahlen, M. Bruns, V. Fricke, C. May, J. Pickett, S. Salaymeh, Westinghouse Savannah River Company (USA)

Tuesday AM 3/2/99

8:30:00 AM SESSION 31 Turquoise Rm.

Transportation Operational Issues and Experience

Cochairs:
Kelvin Kelkenberg, USDOE
Vik Mani, CH2M Hill

1	Status of the Foreign Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel Acceptance Program I. Zeitoun, SAIC; P. Wells, USDOE, (USA)
2	Success and Challenges in Transporting Foreign Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel W. D. Clark, Jr., USDOE (USA)
3	Logistics and Requirements to Internationally Ship Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel - The Contractor Perspective M. Ebert, SAIC, J. Edlow, Edlow International Company (USA)
4	Operational Aspects of TRIGA Shipment from South Korea to INEEL T. Shelton, NAC International (USA)
5	Transport of Spent Fuel in US: What Can be Derived from European Experience? D. Raisonnier, Transnucléaire (FRANCE)
6	New Policy Directions in DOE Transporation Programs - The Senior Executive Transporation Forum K. Kelkenberg, USDOE; L. Harmon, MACTEC (USA)
7	Impacts of the December 15, 1997 Leakage of Low-Level Waste Containers on the Department of Energy's Transportation and Low-Level Radioactive Waste Programs J.M. Ginanni, D.R. Kozlowski, B.R. Hermann, USDOE (USA)
8	Expanding the TRUPACT - II Payload Envelope P. Gregory, E. Hess, Westinghouse Electric Co.; M. Devarakonda, IT Corporation; M. Brown, USDOE (USA)
9	Significant Insights from 15 Years of Impact Limiter Design, Testing and Analysis R.A. Johnson, Packaging Technology, Inc. (USA)

Tuesday AM 3/2/99

8:30:00 AM SESSION 32 Coconino Rm.

The EPA Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) Rule and Approaches to Meeting Continuous Emission Monitoring Requirements

Cochairs:
Lance Mezga, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
David Eaton, INEEL-LMITCO

1	EPA's MACT Rule for Hazardous Waste Combustors F. Chanania, USEPA (USA)
2	The National Technical Workgroup on Mixed Waste Treatment Study on MACT Rule Permitting and Compliance for Mixed Waste Treatment Facilities R.W. Seeker, Energy and Environmental Research Corporation; D. Eaton, Lockheed Martin Idaho Technology Company; C.C. Lee, USEPA (USA)
3	WERF MACT Feasibility Study K. Kooda, LMITCO (USA)
4	A Coordinated Multi-agency Approach to Development of Continuous Emission Monitors S. J. Priebe, Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies (USA)
5	Evaluation of Emissions Monitoring Techniques for Metals and Particulate Matter at the DOE Oak Ridge Toxic Substances Control Act Incinerator J. Dunn, Jr. , R. Sallie, Bechtel Jacobs Company LLC; L. Gibson, Jr., Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc.; R. Baker, Aldora Technologies (USA)
6	Implementing Mercury CEMs in DOE Mixed Waste Treatment Systems N. French, Sky Plus; S.J. Priebe, Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies (USA)
7	Development of a Jet-REMPI Based Continuous Emissions Monitor for Dioxins D.R. Crosley, M.J. Coggiola, G.W. Faris, H. Oser, SRI International (USA)

Tuesday PM 3/2/99

1:00:00 PM SESSION 33 Exhibit Hall A,B,C

Poster - D & D

Cochairs:
Robert Peters, Argonne National Laboratory
Walter Anspach, DETEC (a NUKEM Company)

1	Decontamination and Decommissioning of Building 123 at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site K.A. Dorr, Kaiser-Hill Company; M.T. Aycock, GTS Duratek (USA)
2	SGN's Engineering Capabilities and Project Experience in Nuclear Facility Dismantling and Decommissioning L. Destrait, SGN (FRANCE)
3	Rocky Flats 771/774 Closure Plan – A Work in Progress B. Larson, Safe Sites of Colorado (USA)
4	Integrated Logistics Simulation at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site (RFETS) L.J. Smith, Kaiser-Hill; J.W. Keller, B. Plott, Micro Analysis & Design; L.F. Burdge, P.W. Swenson, G.M. Voorheis, Kaiser-Hill (USA)
5	Designing and Implementing a Life-Cycle Cost Model for First-of-a-Kind Building Decommissioning J. Stevens, R. Williamson, A. Schubert, Kaiser Hill, L.L.C.; R.F. Shangraw, Jr., Project Performance Corporation (USA)
6	Facility Disposition Planning Under Draft DOE Order 430.1A W. Pitka, J. Hansen, J. Burch, W. Austin, Babcock and Wilcox Savannah River Company & Westinghouse Safety Management Solutions (USA)
7	An Overview Of The Savannah River Site (Srs) Decon Facility H.H. Dukes, Westinghouse Savannah River Company (USA)
8	Cleaning and Decontamination Using Strippable and Protective Coatings at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory K. Archibald, R. Demmer, M. Argyle, L. Lauerhass, J. Tripp, Lockheed Martin Idaho Technology Co. (USA)
9	Use of Remote Tools for D&D Operations at the Latina Nuclear Station (Italy) M. Sturvi, ENEL, S. Lefkowitz, Pentek (ITALY/USA)
10	A Multipurpose Transfer Bell for Loading Containers at Greifswald NPP Decommissioning V. Roland, Transnucléaire; J. Raasch, EWN; J. Kozyk, DSR (FRANCE/GERMANY)
11	Don't Reinvent the D&D Wheel-The Potential for Lessons Learned from Experiences Elsewhere A. V. Roberts, BNFL Inc. (USA)
12	Decommissioning in the UK, A Regulatory Perspective D. M. WAtson, HM Nuclear Installations Inspectorate (UNITED KINGDOM)
13	Calculated Radionuclide Inventories For Structural Core Components in the Advanced Test Reactor J.W. Sterbentz, M.L. Carboneau, J.A. Logan, Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Inc. (USA)
14	Decommissioning and Removal of the Fuel Manufacturing Facility at Winfrith M.S. Barents, D. Smith, UKAEA (UK)
15	Radiological Characterization for Environmental Restoration in Case of a Low Risk Level Contaminated Site C. Frujinoiu, Horia-Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering (ROMANIA)
16	Dismantling and Decommissioning Technologies and Techniques for Research Reactors W. Hajek, Physikalisch Technische Bundesanstalt Braunschweig (GERMANY)
17	Dismantling of a Concrete Shielded Facility S.J. Parkinson, R. M. Cornell, NUKEM Nuclear Ltd.; A.T. Staples, UKAEA (UK)
18	Research Reactor Decommissioning - Potential Back End Options M. England, British Nuclear Fuels plc (UK)
19	Decommissioning Planning for Research Reactors in Eastern Europe M.T. Cross, A. Bishop, A.M. Clayton, AEA Technology plc; J.M. Garcia Quiros, R. Garcia Bermejo, INITEC (UK/SPAIN)
20	Applying A Life Cycle Analysis Decision-Aiding Framework To Environmental Restoration Decision Making K. Yuracko, B. Tonn, M. Morris, ORNL; L. Bishop, USDOE (USA)
21	Rocky Flats Closure Project: Planning for Uncertainty L. Burdge, Kaiser-Hill LLC; J. Nolter, Project Analysis & Evaluation (USA)
22	Use of Surfactant Molecules for Nuclear Decontamination B. Fournel, M. Faury, CEA (FRANCE)
23	Advanced Recyclable Media System Demonstrations at Argonne National Laboratory CP5 and Florida International University S. Prewett, S. Pocock, Surface Technology Systems; E. Collins, Argonne National Laboratory; L. Largos, S. Madaris, Florida International University (USA)
24	Application of Protective and Decontamination Polymeric Films for D&D of Contaminated Rooms L. Mamaev, S. Khrabrov, G. Galkin, K. Rybakov, A. Chilikin,S. Mikheikin, VNIINM (RUSSIA)
25	An Informal Expert Judgment Assessment of Subsidence Mitigation Options for Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Sites on the Nevada Test Site B.M. Crowe, Los Alamos National Laboratory; L. Leary, USDOE; R. Jacobson, Desert Research Institute; H. Bensinger, M. Dolenc, Bechtel, Nevada (USA) (USA)
26	Innovative Integration of People and Technology on a Major D&D Project D.W. Clements, G. Codd, BNFL Inc. (USA)
27	Decommissioning Russian Power Reactors J. Allentuck, M.G. Cowgill, R.F. Lavelle, Brookhaven National Laboratory (USA)
28	Decontamination of Surface Radionuclide Contaminated Surfaces Using Surface Abrasion (Scabbling) V. St. Angelo, T. Wheeler, B&W Services, Inc. (USA)
29	Optimizing the Conditioning of Nuclear Waste: The RCR Response J.-J. Gautrot, P. Lederman, H. Masson, COGEMA (FRANCE)
30	Development of Decontamination Technique Before Dismantling for Decommissioning Commercial Nuclear Power Plants S. Saishu, M. Saito, T. Yamanaka, Nuclear Power Engineering Corporation; T. Izumida, Hitachi Ltd.; Z. Sagawa, M. Suzuki, K. Fujiwara, H. Koshikawa, Hitachi Nuclear Engineering Co., Ltd. (JAPAN)
31	The Development of Decontamination Liquid Waste Treatment System for Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Before Dismantling T.Onozawa, S. Saishu, M. Saito, T. Yamanaka, Nuclear Power Engineering Corporation; T. Izumida, K. Funahashi, M. Kondo, Hitachi Ltd.; Y. Furutani, K. Fujiwara, Y. Hashimoto, Hitachi Nuclear Engineering Co., Ltd. (JAPAN)
32	Simple and Effective Chemical Decontamination of Radioactively Contaminated Lead T.C. Zietlow, CORPEX Technologies, Inc. (USA)
33	Management of Mixed Waste Residuals from Chemical Decontamination of Metals T. N. Milner, BNFL; S. Shealy, E. Morren, IT Corporation, C. R. Austin, MSC (USA/UK)
34	Unrestricted Release Measurements with Ambient Air Ionization Monitors D.W. MacArthur, Los Alamos National Laboratory; R. Gunn, T. Dockray, C. Luff, BNFL Instruments (USA/UK)
35	Experience Using the EPRI DfD Process to Decontaminate Scrap Control Rod Drives and Shroud Head Bolts J.M. Harverson, Alaron Corporation (USA)
36	Characterization of RPV, RPV Internals and Core Scrap at Würgassen Nuclear Power Station A. Bleier, E. Polke, SIEMENS AG; B. Christ, DETEC (a NUKEM Company); E. Pollmann, PreussenElektra AG, Kernkraftwerk Würgassen (GERMANY)
37	The Power Tool J.P. Hayfield Jr., B & W Hanford Company (USA)
38	Disposal of PCB Waste from the Dismantlement of Nuclear Power Plants C. Buttram, CH2M Hill (USA)
39	PCBs, Mining, and Water Pollution D.W. Bench, USEPA (USA)
40	Development of A One Step Decontamination Process for Oils Containing Both PCBs and Radioactive Contamination J. Krasznai, J. Janis, R. Cabanus, Ontario Hydro Technologies (CANADA)
41	Destruction of Asbestos Containing Material and PCB’s Into Non-Regulated Recyclables A.D. Foltz , Abestos Recycling Inc.; M.L. Sanders, Engineering Field Activity Northwest Naval Facilities Engineering Command (USA)
42	Organic Destruction and Stabilization/Solidification Bench-Scale Treatability Study for Low-Level, Mixed Tank Wastes C. Blackmore, Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company; W. Withers, W. Stagg, W. Richardson, Babcock and Wilcox Services, Inc. (USA)
43	The Environmental Leadership Program: Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Research & Development of Alternative Polychlorinated Bi-Phenyls Disposal Process Under 40 CFR 761.60(e) D. L. Duncan, C. Massimino, USEPA; G. Sherrell, P. Jones, Puget Sound Naval Shipyard (USA)
44	Lessons Learned - General Atomics Hot Cell Facility Decontamination & Decommissioning Project R. Cummings, J. Davis, USDOE; G. Bramblett, General Atomics (USA)
45	Physiochemical Studies of Basalt-like Materials for Use as Radioactive Waste Immobilization Matrices A.A. Minaev, D.G. Kuznetsov, T.K. Yurik, V.V. Ivanov, A.K. Pikaev, Institute of Physical Chemistry Russian Academy of Sciences (RUSSIA)
46	Physicochemical Studies of Uranium and REE Chromites and Niobates for Use as Radioactive Waste Immobilization Matrices A.A. Minaev, D.G. Kuznetsov, A.K. Pikaev, Institute of Physical Chemistry of Russian Academy of Science (RUSSIA)
47	Development of a Decommissioning Certificate Program J. Hoover, Washington State University Tri-Cities; Numatec Hanford Corp.; M. Morton, Bechtel Hanford, Inc. (USA)
48	Decontamination and Decommissioning of Big Rock Point Nuclear Plant T. Carraway, K. Guay, GTS Duratek; B. Wills, Consumers Energy (USA)
49	Processing of Pantex Wet Waste for Disposal at the Nevada Test Site K. Guay, C. Reno, M. Cage, E. Gray, GTS Duratek; P. Davis, Mason & Hangar Corporation (USA)
50	Wall-And-Curtain for Subsurface Treatment of Strontium-90 in Groundwater D.R. Lee, D.S. Hartwig, M. Klukas, G. Dolinar, S. Lortie, AECL (CANADA)

Tuesday PM 3/2/99

1:30:00 PM SESSION 34 Greenlee Rm.

Strategic Directions for the U.S. Department of Energy's Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Management Program

Cochairs:
Lawrence Harmon, MACTEC

1	Strategic Directions for the US Department of Energy's Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Management Program C.E. Bradley, USDOE; C.A. Blaschke, MACTEC (USA)
2	Managing the Department of Energy’s Uranium Hexafluoride Inventory M. Taylor, Bechtel Jacobs Company; S. Harlow, USDOE (USA)
3	DUCRETE tm Shielded Waste Packages for the Yucca Mountain Repository W.J. Quapp, Starmet Corporation; M. Haas, Morrison Knudsen, Inc. (USA)
4	Benefits of the Use of Depleted Uranium Metal As A Source For Industrial Counterweights T. Roberts, Rental Enterprises (USA)
5	Breaking Down the Barriers to the Beneficial Reuse of Depleted Uranium and its Alloys J.G. Hill, PNNL; S. Baker, Umtanum Enterprises (USA)
6	An Integrated Business Approach to Dispositioning Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride D. Roy, BWX Technologies, Inc.; H. McGuire, Foster Wheeler Environmental Corporation; J. Tucker, Walcoff (USA)

Tuesday PM 3/2/99

1:30:00 PM SESSION 35 Crystal Rm.

University - Developed Technology Deployment

Cochairs:
Abbas Ghassemi, New Mexico State University (WERC)
Ron K. Bhada, New Mexico State University (WERC)

1	Research + Education = Environmental Design Contest R. Bhada, A. Ghassemi, New Mexico State University (USA)
2	Design Proposal for Transporting Tailings and Recovering Copper R. Nauert, Tatum High School; P. Scott, Ft. Sumner High School (USA)
3	Photodiode Sensor Array Measuring Settling Solids K. Anderson, M. Corpening, New Mexico State University (USA)
4	Remediation of Acid Mine Tailings and Recovery of Copper A. Al-Matar, J. Alwin, D. Rockstraw, New Mexico State University (USA)
5	Reclamation and Contained Disposal of Previously Processed Mine Tailings D. Hamlin, M. Gleason, S. Mitchem, J. Watson, H. Chuong, B. Atkinson, G. Thoma, Univesity of Arkansas (USA)
5	Application of High-Penetrating Cement Mortars for Cementation of a Solid Radioactive Waste I. A. Sobolev, F.A. Lifanov, A.E. Savkin, A.P. Varlakov, E.A. Kovalskiy, SIA "Radon" (RUSSIA)
6	Leveling the Risk Playing Field: Developing a Tribal Risk Curriculum A. Young, USDOE (USA)
7	Solids Settling Remote Sensor H. Gerbrandt, E. Warner, M. Zeiler, D. Wollatt, Montana Tech of the University of Montana (USA)

Tuesday PM 3/2/99

1:30:00 PM SESSION 36 Turquoise Rm.

Infrastructure Issues in Waste Management

Cochairs:
Jas Devgun, DE&S
Peter Brennecke, Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz (BfS)

1	Technical and Economic Issues in Radioactive Waste Conditioning P.W. Brennecke, Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz (GERMANY)
2	The Influence of the Complex Macroeconomic Environment on the Financing Aspects of Radwaste Management D. Emmery, P.L. Kunsch, ONDRAF/NIRAS (BELGIUM)
3	Segmentation Strategies Used in Calculating Category 3 Threshold Values at the Radioactive and Mixed Waste Management Facility, Sandia National Laboratories, New Mexico J. Jarry, Sandia National Laboratories; M. Spoerner, EDI; J. Hylko, R. Boom, M. Smith, Roy F. Weston, Inc. (USA)
4	Legacy Material Work-Off Project T.J. Sloan, Los Alamos National Laboratory; D.H. Baker IV, Benchmark Environmental Corporation (USA)
5	Software for Tracking Containerized Waste from Cradle to Grave J.F. Garcia, B.K. Seggerty, INEEL (USA)
6	A Preliminary Model for Improved Hazardous Materials Management in the United States of America-Mexico Border Region W. Roberds, Golder Associates Inc.; L. Eriksson, GRAM, Inc.; G. Scott, USDOE (USA)
7	Implementing Integrated Safety Management Principles to Accelerate Work-off of Pantex Plant Legacy Waste W.G. Estill, Mason & Hanger Corporation (USA)
8	The Financing of Radioactive Waste Disposal in the Czech Republic M. Kucerka, J. Liehnová, J. Cimburek, RAWRA (CZECH REPUBLIC)

Tuesday PM 3/2/99

1:30:00 PM SESSION 37 Graham Rm.

Treatment of Problematic LLW & MW Streams (Tritium and Actinides)

Cochairs:
Leon C. Borduin, Los Alamos National Laboratory
C.F. Wu, Westinghouse Electric Co.

1	Parametric Optimization of the MEO Process for Treatment of Mixed Waste Residues M.E. Cournoyer, W.H. Smith, Los Alamos National Laboratory (USA)
2	Treatment of Plutonium Process Residues by Molten Salt Oxidation J. Stimmel, K. Ramsey, J. Brock, R. Wishau, A. Montoya, Los Alamos National Laboratory; M. Helsop, NSWC-Indian Head (USA)
3	Pebble Bed Pyrolysis for the Processing of Alpha Contaminated Organic Effluents P. Luycx, Belgoprocess (BELGIUM)
4	Disposition of Mixed Waste Organics at the Los Alamos Plutonium Facility S.B. Schreiber, S.L. Yarbro, E.M. Ortiz, F. Coriz, S. Balkey, Los Alamos National Laboratory (USA)
5	Tritium Recovery from Waste Using a Palladium Membrane Reactor S.A. Birdsell, R.S. Willms, Los Alamos National Laboratory (USA)
6	The Catalytic Oxidation of the Tritiated Mixed Wastes in the Presence of Steam L.Y. Chang, H. Morimoto, C. Than, R. Watson, P.G. Williams, University of California (USA)

Tuesday PM 3/2/99

1:30:00 PM SESSION 38 Copper Rm.

Excess Plutonium & Uranium from Weapons and Residues - Progress in Disposition Technologies (ie spent fuel standard disposition)

Cochairs:
Leonard Gray, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Hervé Masson, COGEMA

1	The Blending Strategy for the Plutonium Immobilization Program L.W. Gray, T.A. Edmunds, B.B. Ebbinghaus, S. Gentry, R.A. Vankonynenburg, LLNL; D.C. Riley, SAIC; J. Spingarn, SNL (USA)
2	Immobilization of Surplus U.S. Plutonium for Eventual Geologic Disposition G.A. Armantrout, WA. Brummond, B. Ebbinghaus, B. Hobson, P. Fuhrman, LLNL; C. Cicero-Herman, D. Herman, D. Hiland, D. Pak, K.D. Peterson, T.J. Rankin, J. Congdon, WSRC (USA)
3	Performance Testing of Immobilization Plutonium Ceramics - Overview of Results L. Gray, H. Shaw, LLNL (USA)
4	Thorium Phosphate-Diphosphate as a Ceramic for the Immobilization of Tetravalent Uranium, Neptunium, and Plutonium M. Genet, N. Dacheux, A.C. Thomas, B. Chassigneux, E. Pichot, V. Brandel, Nuclear Physics Institute, University of Par (FRANCE)
5	Disposition of Weapons-grade Plutonium in PWR’s : a Technical Assessement Based on MOX Fuel Experience Acquired in France G. Lebastard, D. Greneche, COGEMA; C. Callens, J. Pelet, Framatome (FRANCE)
6	From Weapons Plutonium to MOX Fuel : The DEMOX Project C. Seyve, L. Gaiffe , COGEMA; E. Kudriavtsev, Y. Kolotilov, MINATOM; G. Brähler, H. Mettlin, SIEMENS
7	Immobilization of Excess Weapons Origin Plutonium In Russia L. Jardine, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (USA)
8	Plutonium and Actinides Immobilization in Ceramic (Silica Gel Technology and Gasostatic Hot Pressing) N.N. Egorov, Ministry of the Russian Federation for Atomic Energy; A.K. Nardova, E.A. Filippov, Russian Research Institute for Chemical Technology; V.A. Starchenko, V.G. Khlopin Radium Institute (RUSSIA)
9	Plutonium-Water Criticality Hazard in Nuclear Waste Disposal D.L. Hetrick, University of Arizona (USA)

Tuesday PM 3/2/99

1:30:00 PM SESSION 39 Gila Rm.

Environmental Restoration - Regulatory and Order "Push Back" Programs at Federal Sites and Facilities

Cochairs:
Timothy K. Campbell, WASTREN
Jerome Gonzales, USDOE

1	Maintaining Effective Working Relationships with Regulators During Remedial Action T. Hagen, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., J. Reising, USDOE, T. Schneider, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (USA)
2	Implementation of the DOE Policy on Integration of Natural Resource Concerns into Response Actions C. Martins, HAZMED; J. Bascietto, P. Karcz, USDOE (USA)
3	Complex-wide Trends in the Disposition of Environmental Restoration Wastes J. Clay, USDOE; M. Hashem, K. von Flotow, Project Performance Corporation (USA)
4	Radiologically Contaminated Soils Remedy at Brookhaven National Laboratory G. Penny, USDOE; J. Brower, BNL; J. Knapp, CDM Federal Programs Corp. (USA)
5	Environmental Restoration at the Savannah River Site: Strategic Approach Produces Significant Progress with Innovative Technology and In-Field Results T. F. Heenan, USDOE; R. R. Harbert, W. D. Hoffman, N. A. Lawrence, Westinghouse Savannah River Company (USA)
6	Residue Characterization at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site K.A. Phillips, Safe Sites of Colorado, L.L.C. (USA)

Tuesday PM 3/2/99

1:30:00 PM SESSION 40 Maricopa Rm.

D&D - DOE Facility Closure Projects

Cochairs:
James Goodenough, USDOE
John Smith, BNFL Inc.

1	Records Management for Building Closure Projects: Federal Facility Best Practices W.D. Featherman, Project Performance Corporation (USA)
2	U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Plans Rulemaking on Clearance of Materials and Equipment Having Residual Radioactivity F.P. Cardile, R.A. Nelson, USNRC (USA)
3	Landfill Closure of the Old Waste Calcining Facility R. Demmer, J. Bosley, M. Davis, D. Preussner, S. Aitken, Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Co., Inc. (USA)
4	D&D/Reindustrialization of Building K-1420 at the East Tennessee Technology Park L. Escue, Decon and Recovery Services of Oak Ridge, LLC (USA)
5	779 Closure Project - The First Plutonium Facility at Rocky Flats M.K. Korenko, K.D. Trice, H.C. Wolf, Safe Sites of Colorado (USA)
6	The Performance Assessment Impacts of Disposal of High-Moisture, Low-Level Radioactive Waste at the Nevada Test Site B.M. Crowe, W. Hansen, LANL, R. Waters,Sandia National Laboratory, M. Sully, D. Levitt, Bechtel Nevada, A. Hechanova, Harry Reid Ctr. For Env. Studies UNLV, R. Jacobson, Desert Research Institute, C. Voss, Golder Associates Inc., (USA)

Tuesday PM 3/2/99

1:30:00 PM SESSION 41 Coconino Rm.

Risk, Routing and System Issues in Transporting Radioactive Materials

Cochairs:
Richard Yoshimura, Sandia National Laboratory
Kelvin Kelkenberg, USDOE

1	Methodological Consensus In Comparing Routes for Transporting Spent Nuclear Fuel F. Dilger, Clark County Nuclear Waste Division (USA)
2	Assessment of Mode and Route Selection Factors for Shipping High-Level Radioactive Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel J. Allen, ICF Kaiser International, Inc. (USA)
3	Intermodal Transportation of Low-Level Waste to the Nevada Test Site E.F. DiSanza, M.O. Giblin, USDOE; J.P. Johnston, Bechtel Nevada Corporation (USA)
4	Risk Assessment for Sample WIPP and Yucca Mountain Shipments R.L. Steinman, University of Michigan; R. Weiner, Sandia National Laboratories (USA)
5	Incremental Risks of Transporting NARM to the LLW Disposal Facility at Hanford R. Weiner, Sandia National Laboratories (USA)
6	Plutonium-238 Decision Analysis Mike Brown U.S. DOE Carlsbad Area Office Carlsbad, NM M. Brown, USDOE; D. J. Lechel, Lechel, Inc; C.D. Leigh, Sandia National Laboratories (USA)
7	Up-Front Low-Level Waste Shipment Certification M. Kaplan, F.J. Valenzuela, Horne Engineering (USA)

Tuesday PM 3/2/99

1:30:00 PM SESSION 42 Mohave Rm.

Resources Recovery and Waste Management at Uranium Mining, Extraction, and Processing Facilities

Cochairs:
Michelle Rehmann, International Uranium (USA) Corporation
Wolfgang Pfeifer, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH

1	Investigations and Radiological Assessment of Mining Residues and Sites in Germany-Experience and Results E. Ettenhuber, Federal Office for Radiation Protection (GERMANY)
2	Remedial Action for the Radioactive Waste Rock Piles in China C. Zhangru, S. Lanying, J. Yuanxin, Beijing Research Institute of Uranium Geology (PR CHINA)
3	Design and Construction of a Disposal Cell for Abandoned Uranium Mill Tailings at Maybell, Colorado A. M. Banani, D.R. Sanders, K. Hamilton, W. Woodworth; Morrison Knudsen Corporation (USA)
4	Cost Effective Disposal and Recycling Options for FUSRAP Material J. Peterson, R. McNutt, B.C. Rogers, US Army Corps of Engineers (USA)
5	Recycling and Disposal of FUSRAP Materials from the Ashland 2 Site B. K. Howard, ICF Kaiser Engineers; D. J. Conboy, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; M. R. Rehmann, H. R. Roberts, International Uranium (USA) Corporation (USA)
6	Recycling Uranium Contaminated Scrap Which Contains Impurities of Aluminium in a Foundry M. Hamm, M. Tholen, R. Kreh, Siempelkamp Nuklear-und Umwelttechnik GmbH & Co. (GERMANY)

Change days