Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
This panel session focuses on the progress of deep repository programs worldwide. While efforts on a deep geological repository for SNFUNF and HLW in the USA were terminated in 2010 several other repository programs continue to make considerable progress. Panelists will be invited from national repository programs and organizations to report upon the current status and future plans as well as the perceived reasons underlying the success and the failure of components of their respective repository program. This panel will provide a forum for interested parties to present exchange and take advantage of as appropriate repository progress challenges conceptsdesigns and other lessons learned around the world including site characterization site selection research and development licensing construction operation and public acceptance and participation. Panelists George Dials President and Project Manager Pajarito Scientific Corporation Grald Ouzounian Director International Department Andra France Thilo Von Berlepsch DBE Technology GmbH Germany Bruce McKirdy Managing Director Radioactive Waste Management United Kingdom Session 59 1515 - 1700 Room 105C Global Advances in HLW Retrieval Equipment Session Co-Chairs Kent Fortenberry Savannah River Remediation Terry Sams Washington River Protection Solutions Lead Organizer Bill Wilmarth Savannah River National Laboratory Paper Reviewer Larry Ling AECOM - Savannah River Remediation 1520 A Unique Design Approach for Extending Service Life of a Failed Thermosyphon Evaporator - 16330 Sandeep Patil Ratan Kumar Brian Dennis University of Texas Arlington RK Gupta Anil kumar Singh Bhabha Atomic Research Centre India 1545 Overcoming Waste Removal Challenges at Savannah River Site A Case Study of Tank 15 - 16198 Seth Campbell Toby Hess Scott Plummer Savannah River Remediation 1610 Leak Testing with Simulated Waste of Hanford Tank Farm Valves Utilized for Double Valve Isolation - 16108 Carl Enderlin Harold Adkins Jr Beric Wells Jeromy Jenks Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Jason Engeman Washington River Protection Solutions Session 60 1330 - 1510 Room 106C DOE Hanford - Direct Feed Low Activity Waste DFLAW Program Execution - Part 3 of 4 Session Co-Chairs Garth Duncan Bechtel National Inc. Rose Russell Washington River Protection Solutions Lead Organizer Karthik Subramanian Washington River Protection Solutions Additional Organizers Renee Davis Washington River Protection Solutions Garth Duncan Bechtel National Inc. Paper Reviewer Renee Davis Washington River Protection Solutions 1335 Integrated Waste Feed Qualification Program for Direct LAW Feed to WTP - 16421 Aruna Arakali Peter Benson AECOM Garth Duncan Bechtel National Inc. Renee Davis Mike Thien Stuart Arm Washington River Protection Solutions 1400 Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Conceptual Design Approach - 16568 Cliff Winkler David Houghton Washington River Protection Solutions 1425 WTP Modifications to Support DFLAW LAW BOF Lab - 16219 Kim Irwin Robert Henckel Bruce Schapell Bechtel National Inc. Jeffrey Bruggeman Jason Young US DOE 1450 Integrated Readiness Activities for the Direct Feed LAW Program - 16221 Scott Booth AECOM - URS Alisa Sheridan URS-AECOM Rob Glibert US DOE Martin Wheeler Glenn Beaumier Washington River Protection Solutions Richard Garrett Waste Treatment Plant - One System TUESDAY PM 80