Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Session 22 1515 - 1700 Exhibit Hall 4 Panel US DOE - Excess Facilities DD Implementation Plans Session Co-Chairs Cathy Hickey CH2M HILL Inc. Andrew Szilagyi US DOE Lead Organizer Cathy Hickey CH2M HILL Inc. Additional Organizers Shannon Farrell CH2M HILL Inc. Tania Smith US DOE - NNSA Andrew Szilagyi US DOE Panel Reporter Shannon Farrell CH2M HILL Inc. This panel session focuses on the US DOE Office of Environmental Managements actions taken in response to the January 2015 Inspector Generals Audit Report on the Department of Energys Management of High Risk Facilities. DOE EM in collaboration with the National Nuclear Security Administration NNSA the Office of Science OS and Office of Nuclear Energy NE initiated a joint working group to aid in the risk prioritization life cycle cost analysis and improved disposition planning of excess facilities across the US DOE complex. WM attendees interested in DOE plans to implement this strategy are encouraged to attend this panel session. Panelists Jeff Smith Deputy Director for Operations Oak Ridge National Laboratory Deborah Couchman-Griswold Deputy Director NNSA US DOE Andrew Szilagyi Director Office of DDFacility Engineering US DOE Session 23 1330 - 1510 Room 106A Experience in Salt Waste Processing Worldwide Examples Session Co-Chairs Harold Adkins Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Steven Thomson National Nuclear Laboratory United Kingdom Lead Organizer Robert Jubin Oak Ridge National Laboratory Additional Organizers Paul Bredt Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Steven Thomson National Nuclear Laboratory United Kingdom Paper Reviewer Paul Bredt Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 1335 Developing Waste-Driven Design Requirements for Filtration and Ion- Exchange at the Hanford LAWPS Facility - 16394 Jacob Reynolds Cliff Winkler Washington River Protection Solutions Benjamin Tardiff AEM Consulting LLC 1400 Filtration Improvements in Support of Increased Salt Waste Processing Throughput at the Savannah River Site - 16173 Jay McCrary Azadeh Azi Samadi Mark Keefer John Neuville Jeffrey Bentley Savannah River Remediation 1425 Common Issues in Projects Separated Only by an Ocean - 16050 Graham Jonsson NDA United Kingdom 1450 Mercury Speciation in Savannah River Site High-Level Waste Determination and Implications for Waste Handling and Disposal - 16178 Bill Wilmarth Christopher Bannochie Charles Crawford Marissa Reigel Thomas P Peters Savannah River National Laboratory Patrick Garcia-Strickland Eurofins Frontier Global Sciences Hasmukh Shah Savannah River Remediation Session 24 1515 - 1700 Room 103AB PanelPapers Getting a Handle on DD Costs - a Global Perspective Session Co-Chairs Jorge Borque ENRESA Spain Jas Devgun Consultant Lead Organizer Paper Reviewer Jas Devgun Consultant Additional Organizers Al Freitag Consultant Thomas LaGuardia LaGuardia Associates LLC Panel Reporter Michelle Claggett Project Enhancement Corporation This panel focuses on decommissioning costs as they are difficult to assess without significant uncertainty. Data comparisons from completed decommissioning projects from those that are in progress and those that are being planned have shown steep escalation in project costs. This panel will focus on the cost control issues methodologies and experience in national and international projects. Specifically the panel discussion will include improving cost estimation models reasons for cost escalation and strategies for reining in the overall decommissioning costs. MONDAY PM 60