Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Session 12 1000 - 1200 Room 105C The Effectiveness of Advisory Boards the US DOE EM Site Specific Experience Session Co-Chairs Kimberly Brinkley South Carolina Dept of Health Environmental Control Jenny Freeman Strata-G Lead Organizer Jenny Freeman Strata-G Additional Organizers Kimberly Brinkley South Carolina Dept of Health Environmental Control Paper Reviewer David Borak US DOE 1005 How The US DOE EM Office Engages the Public on Complex Issues - 16532 David Borak US DOE Donna Hruska Nevada Site Specific Advisory Board 1030 Public Participation at the Savannah River Site Citizen Advisory Board Meetings - 16343 Nina Spinelli Savannah River Site Citizens Advisory Board 1055 Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board Adapts to Engage - 16459 Belinda Price David Hemelright Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board 1120 Grassroots Efforts to Clarify the High-level Waste HLW Definition - 16433 Rick McLeod Savannah River Site Community Reuse Organization MARCH 7 MONDAY PM Session 13 1330 - 1510 Room 105AB Panel Featured Country United Kingdom Session Co-Chairs Graham Jonsson NDA United Kingdom Michael Rosenfeld UKTI Lead Organizer John Mathieson NDA United Kingdom Additional Organizers Graham Jonsson NDA United Kingdom Fred Sheil Sheil Consulting Ltd United Kingdom Panel Reporter Angie Jones Amec Foster Wheeler This two -part panel session will provide a deeper perspective of the challenges associated with decommissioning and clean-up activities at legacy nuclear sites in the UK and provide comparisons with the US. In a tough economic environment how does the UK prioritize its spending and balance the competing issues of the costs of cleaning up its sites while meeting stakeholder expectations including those of the regulator The panelists will further explore the importance and experiences of collaborating at the site and institution level to address these challenges. A US perspective will be provided. Panelists Peter Lutwyche Sellafield Programme Director Nuclear Decommissioning Authority United Kingdom Tom Foster Chief Decommissioning Officer Sellafield Ltd United Kingdom Victoria Winspear -Roberts Superintending Inspector Office for Nuclear Regulation United Kingdom Martin Grant CEO Atkins Energy United Kingdom Myrian Wood Acting Director National Nuclear Laboratory United Kingdom Stacy Charboneau Manager Richland Operations Office US DOE Session 014 1515 - 1700 Room 105AB Panel Featured Country United Kingdom Session Co-Chairs Eric Knox AECOM John Mathieson NDA United Kingdom Lead Organizer John Mathieson NDA United Kingdom Additional Organizers Angie Jones Amec Foster Wheeler Graham Jonsson NDA United Kingdom Panel Reporter Angie Jones Amec Foster Wheeler This panel session will provide a perspective of the challenges related to waste management and disposal activities associated with the UKs nuclear programme. There will be a discussion of the current arrangements for LLW disposal and the forward plans for geological disposal. These have to deal with the current waste arisings LLW HLW from reprocessing and spent nuclear fuel from legacy facilities operating nuclear plants and the new build power stations. With only one national LLW facility available and no site yet for a geological disposal facility how is the UK addressing the challenge Scotland has its own policy on radioactive waste and its influence will be discussed. A US view will also be provided from the perspective of the Yucca Mountain programme. MONDAY AM MONDAY PM 56