SIA RADON ACTIVITY IN DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING OF
HIGH LEVEL AND ACTINIDE WASTES SOLIDIFICATION
PROCESSES AND WASTEFORMS CHARACTERIZATION

I.A. Sobolev, S.A. Dmitriev, F.A. Lifanov, S.V. Stefanovsky, and V.L. Tarasov
SIA Radon
7th Rostovskii per. 2/14
Moscow 119121 Russia
phone/fax: 7 (095) 919-3194

ABSTRACT

SIA Radon is responsible for management of low- and intermediate-level radioactive waste (LILW) of central Russia. In cooperation with Minatom organizations Radon carries out research on treatment of simulated high level waste (HLW) as well. Study of materials for LILW, HLW, and Nuclear Power Plants (NPP) waste immobilization, and development and testing of processes and technologies for waste treatment and disposal are carried out.

Cement, glass, and glass composites were recognized to be appropriate materials for LILW solidification. Among inorganic materials suitable for HLW immobilization, the most promising are as follows: glass, including phase-separated glass, glass-crystalline materials, single phase ceramics (zirconolite/pyrochlore, murataite, perovskite, NZP, apatite, sphene), polyphase ceramics (Synroc). Radon R&D activity in the field of glass includes development and testing of waste glasses, chemical analysis and determination of glass properties (viscosity, electric resistivity, density, leaching, radiation stability, etc.), and study of glass structure.

Inhomogeneous and ceramic materials are also considered as appropriate wasteforms. Activity in this area includes study of phase-separated glasses, glass crystalline materials, composite, and ceramic materials, including Synroc and single phase ceramics, phase analysis, elements distribution among co-existing phases, and determination of material properties (density, leaching, mechanical strength, radiation stability, etc.).

Among technological researches, the most promising are development and testing of the cold crucible inductive melting process, design and construction of the cold crucible, development and testing of the plasma arc treatment of solid waste, plasma arc melting process, and integrated plasma treatment-inductive melting process.

INTRODUCTION

SIA Radon is responsible for management of low- and intermediate-level radioactive waste (LILW) of central Russia, including their collection, transportation, interim storage, treatment, final disposal, and moreover Radon deals with radioecological monitoring of Moscow and surrounding regions, remediation of radiation accidents, environmental clean-up and restoration [1]. Radon in cooperation with Minatom carries out researches on simulated high level waste (HLW) immobilization as well.

Scientific scope of Radon regarding radioactive waste management are study of materials for waste immobilization, and development and testing of processes and technologies for waste treatment and disposal [2,3]. In particular, Radon in cooperation with Institute of Geology of Ore Deposits, Mineralogy, Petrography, and Geochemistry of Russian Academy of Sciences (IGEM RAS) deals with development and testing some of materials and processes for HLW immobilization, including Synroc process [4].

This paper describes scientific and technological areas where Radon is the mostly experienced such as study of novel wasteforms, cold crucible melting/vitrification and plasma treatment of wastes.

LILW IMMOBILIZATION

Cement, glass, including phase-separated glass, glass-crystalline materials, and glass composites were recognized to be appropriate waste forms for LILW solidification.

Cementation was the first process developed for LILW solidification in the middle of 1960s [1]. However, cement wasteforms have a low chemical durability and mechanical strength, and moreover, no waste volume reduction at the cementation process (Table I).

Table I. Comparison of liquid LILW treatment methods.

Parameters

Cementation

Bituminization

Vitrification

Process temperature, 0C

Room

120-140

8501-15002

Volume reduction factor

0.5-0.7

1.0-1.2

3-7

Cs leach rate from solidified product, g/(cm2× day)3

10-2-10-3

10-3-10-4

10-5-10-7

Compressive strength of the product, MPa

70-100

Very low

500-900

Radiation stability

Low

Very low

High

1Phosphate glass, 2Aluminosilicate glass, 3IAEA technique, 28th day of leaching in deionized water.

Unlike cementation being suitable for solidification of LILW with low salt content only, bituminization technology can be used for treatment of high-salt waste. But, this process, like cementation, has many disadvantages, for example, fire danger, low waste volume reduction factor (VRF), relatively high leaching of radionuclides from bituminized waste, soil contamination with nitrates, etc.

Glassy wasteforms were recognized to be more appropriate compared to cementous and bituminous wasteforms due to higher chemical durability, VRF, mechanical strength, long-term stability under hydrogeological conditions.

Radon R&D activity in field of glassy wasteforms includes development and testing of glasses for LILW immobilization, chemical analysis and determination of glass properties (viscosity, electric resistivity, density, leaching, radiation stability, etc.), and study of glass structure.

Institutional LILW contains sodium nitrate as major component (up to ~600 kg/ m3) and minor calcium-magnesium carbonate, ferrous compounds, sulfates and chlorides. To transform LILW to stable solid forms a borosilicate glass has been chosen. Boron free aluminosilicate glasses may be used as well.

Natural minerals and rocks: datolite CaBSiO4(OH), dolomite CaMg(CO3)2, bentonite, and loam clay are used as glass forming additives.

Glasses obtained relate to the following forming systems:

  1. Na2O-CaO-(MgO)-Al2O3-SiO2;
  2. Na2O-CaO-(MgO)-Al2O3-Fe2O3-SiO2;
  3. Na2O-CaO-(MgO)-Al2O3-B2O3-SiO2;
  4. Na2O-CaO-(MgO)-Al2O3-Fe2O3-B2O3-SiO2.

Radioactive constituent includes 134,137Cs, 90Sr, 60Co, 144Ce, and traces of actinides. Waste volume activity ranges between 107 and 1010 Bq/m3 on b -g -emitters, and between 105 and 106 Bq/m3 on a -emitters. Glasses obtained have specific activity 105-107 Bq/kg on b -g -emitters and 102-104 on a -emitters. It corresponds to weight concentration of radionuclides of 10-2-10-5 %.

The same systems are basic for conventional glasses used in industry and glass formation in these systems is studied well. A feature of waste glasses is elevated sodium content in order to reach the highest waste oxide content.

NPP wastes from RBMK and WWER type reactors were also studied. Chemical composition of RBMK waste is very close to institutional waste and it contains mainly sodium nitrate. Therefore, the above-listed systems can be applied for immobilization of RBMK waste as well. WWER waste contains both sodium nitrate and sodium tetrahydroxylborate as major components. Vitrification of this waste does not require boron containing additives. WWER waste glasses relate to systems #3 and #4.

At vitrification of sulfate- and chloride-bearing wastes phase separation problem occurs. SO42- and Cl- solubility in silicate melts is known to be approximately ~1 wt% each [5]. Excess of sulfates and chlorides results in the phase separation. Waste oxide content limitation in glass is estimated to be 5-10 wt.%. To prevent the phase separation several methods were tested. Among them:

Vitrification of sulfate-chloride-containing waste yields inhomogeneous (phase-separated) glasses or glass-composite materials consisting of dispersed sulfate-chloride radiophase distributed in matrix vitreous phase. Distribution factor for radiocesium between sulfate-chloride phase and glass is approximately 10. Study of inhomogeneous and composite materials comprises investigations of the structure of phase-separated glasses, phase analysis of glass crystalline materials and composites, and study of elements distribution among co-existing phases, determination of material properties (density, leaching, mechanical strength, radiation stability, etc.) and their comparison with properties of homogeneous and ceramic wasteforms. The main analytical methods used are atomic absorption spectroscopy, emission spectral analysis, b -g -spectrometry, a -spectrometry, infra-red spectroscopy, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning and transmission electron microscopy (SEM/TEM), electron microprobe analysis (EMPA), viscosimetry, electric resistivity measurements, 60Co source accelerating facility for radiation researches. Properties of LILW glasses are summarized in Table II.

Table II. Properties of liquid LILRW glasses.

Properties

Datolite-based boro-silicate glasses with high sodium LILRW

Boro-silicate glasses with
WWER waste

Loam-based alumino-silicate glasses with high sodium LILRW

Sulfate-bearing vanadia-doped boro-silicate glasses

Sulfate-bearing lead-doped boro-silicate glasses

Glass composites

Waste oxide content, wt%

30-35

35-45

30-45

15-25

10-20

15-30

Viscosity, Pa× s, at 1200 0C

3.5-5.0

2.5-4.5

3.5-6.5

2.5-4.5

2.0-3.5

3.0-6.0*

Resistivity, W × m, at 1200 0C

0.03-0.05

0.02-0.04

0.04-0.06

0.015-0.035

0.015-0.025

0.03-0.05*

Density, g/cm3

2.5-2.7

2.4-2.6

2.5-2.6

2.5-2.6

2.8-3.5

2.4-2.7*

Compressive strength, Mpa

800-1000

700-850

700-900

800-1000

800-1000

500-700

Leach
rate,
g/(cm2× day),
after 28th
day of
leaching

137Cs

10-5-10-6

~10-5

~10-5

10-4-10-5

~10-5

10-4-10-5

90Sr

10-6-10-7

~10-6

~10-7

10-6-10-7

10-6-10-7

10-6-10-7

Mn,Fe,CoNi

10-7-10-8

~10-7

10-7-10-8

10-7-10-8

~10-7

10-7-10-8

REE,actinides

£ 10-8

£ 10-8

£ 10-8

£ 10-8

£ 10-8

£ 10-8

Na+

10-5-10-6

~10-5

~10-5

10-4-10-5

~10-5

10-4-10-5

SO42-

~10-6 **

-

10-5-10-6

~10-5

~10-5

10-4-10-5

* for vitreous phase, ** if present

IMMOBILIZATION OF SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE, CONTAINING URANIUM AND PLUTONIUM, IN GLASS AND GLASS CERAMICS.

Solid burnable radioactive waste at Radon is burned in chamber-type incinerator with fuel heating [1]. Incinerator ash is incorporated in cement matrix. Numerous disadvantages of cementous wasteforms stimulated search of more appropriate wasteforms. The most promising wasteforms seem to be glassy or glass-crystalline materials.

Chemical composition of incinerator ash (in wt%): 2-8 Na2O, 3-9 K2O, 8-20 CaO, 3-7 MgO, 4-18 Al2O3, 3-33 FeOn, <1-2 MnO, 1-3 Cr2O3, 14-38 SiO2, <1-4 TiO2, 2-22 P2O5, 2-14 ignition loss (organic residue and carbon). Specific activities on b -g -emitters and a -emitters are 106-107 and 106-108 Bq/kg, respectively. The most important alpha-emitters are 235,238U, 239Pu, and 241Am. Maximum concentrations in the vitrified samples are 235U - 0.02 %, 238U - 2%, 239Pu -~4× 10-4 %, 241Am - ~5× 10-7 %. Traces of 210Po and 226Ra are also present. Taking into account ash chemical composition, some flux additives for vitrification were tested (Table III). Both borosilicate and aluminosilicate glasses were designed [6]. Properties of the ash-containing materials are given in Table IV.

Table III. Flux additives to incinerator ash and melting temperatures.

Flux additives

Melting temperatures, oC

no flux (ash)

1400-1500

sodium disilicate Na2O× 2SiO2

1350-1400

sodium trisilicate Na2O× 3SiO2

1400-1500

sodium tetrasilicate Na2O× 4SiO2

1450-1550

borax Na2O× 2B2O3

1050-1200

Borosilicate frit (glass with ~30-40 wt% of LILRW oxides)

1250-1350

dolomite CaMg(CO3)2 + loam clay or bentonite (2:1)

1350-1450

 

Table IV. Properties of ash-containing glasses

 

Fluxing agents

Properties

Na2O×
2B2O3

Na2O×
2SiO2

Na2O×
3SiO2

Na2O×
4SiO2

Boro-silicate
frit

Dolomite:
Loam clay (Bentonite)
=2:1

Waste oxide content, wt%

80-95

60-80

50-80

40-60

50-80

70-85

Viscosity, Pa× s, at 1300 0C

3.0-6.0

4.5-8.5

5.0-10.0

5.5-10.0

4.0-8.0

6.0-10.0

Resistivity, W × m, at 1300 0C

0.025-0.050

0.03-0.06

0.04-0.07

0.07-0.13

0.035-0.075

0.04-0.10

Density, g/cm3

2.5-2.7

2.5-2.7

2.5-2.6

2.5-2.6

2.5-2.7

2.6-2.8

Compressive strength, MPa

500-800

700-900

800-1000

850-1100

750-900

800-1000

Leach rate,

137Cs

~10-5

10-6-10-7

10-6-10-7

10-6-10-8

10-6-10-7

10-7-10-8

g/(cm2× day)

90Sr

~10-6

~10-8

£ 10-8

£ 10-8

10-7-10-8

£ 10-8

on 28th day

239Pu

£ 10-8

£ 10-8

£ 10-8

£ 10-8

£ 10-8

£ 10-8

From XRD data source incinerator ash consists of b -whitlockite Ca3(PO4)2, hydroxylapatite Ca10(PO4)6[(OH)2,CO3)], calcite CaCO3, quartz SiO2, plagioclase, and amorphous phase. The same source ash heated to 1000 0C contains b -whitlockite, hydroxylapatite, potassium aluminosilicates kalsilite KAlSiO4 and leucite KAlSi2O6, and quartz. After heating to 1450 0C b -whitlockite and vitreous phase were only found.

Vitrified ash melted at 1450 0C with dolomite-bentonite flux contains nagelschmidtite Ca7(PO4)2(SiO4)2 and amorphous phase. Vitrified samples are inhomogeneous. The sample vitrified with dolomite-bentonite flux was found to be more homogeneous compared to samples of vitrified unfluxed ash.

A study of waste elements distribution in the vitrified ash was also carried out. In the vitrified ash sections depleted and enriched with Ca, P, and Si and some Cr-rich inclusions were found. Matrix glass contains K, Al, Fe, and Si. It confirms XRD data showing occurrence of whitlockite or nagelschmidtite. These minerals are host phases for Sr, rare earths, Th, and U, and probably another actinides (Pu, Am). Cr-rich inclusions are possibly Cr-containing spinel that was not detected by XRD due to very small content. These may concentrate Mn, Fe, and Co.

CRYSTALLINE HOSTS FOR HIGH LEVEL WASTE

Both glass and ceramic are considered as possible host materials for high-level and actinide wastes. Vitreous state is thermodynamically unstable. Therefore, glass may be devitrified during long-term storage. Effect of glass devitrification on radionuclide retention and safety of their immobilization is variable and not known in details. Unlike glass, natural minerals are stable for geological periods and crystalline ceramics can guarantee safe immobilization of long-lived radionuclides for long-term periods (up to hundreds of millions years).

Among crystalline host phases, various synthetic analogs of natural minerals are considered (Table V). We pay the most attention to the synthetic minerals that can be produced through melting. These are synthetic zirconolite, pyrochlore, perovskite, hollandite, murataite, britholite, sphene, brannerite, pyroxenes, iron-alumina garnets, etc., and their assemblages (Synroc).

Table V. Host minerals for waste elements incorporation.

Minerals or class of minerals

Ionic radii, nm

Waste elements

pyroxenes: Me(1)2+Me(2)2+Si2O6; Me(1)+Me(2)3+Si2O6
augite (Ca,Na)(Mg,Fe2+Fe3+,Al)[(Si,Al)2O6]
aegirine (akmite) NaFe3+Si2O6
jadeite NaAlSi2O6

Na+ - 0.098; Mg2+ -0.074
Ca2+ - 0.104;Fe2+ -0.080
Fe3+ -0.067 ; Al3+ -0.057
Si4+ -0.039

Na, Y, Ln, Mn, Ti, Cr, Fe, Co, Ni

nepheline KNa3[SiAlO4]4

K+ -0.133; Rb+ 0.149

Na, Rb, Cs

leucite, kalsilite KAlSi2O6, pollucite CsAlSi2O6

K+ -0.133; Al3+ -0.057
Si4+ -0.039; Ti4+ -0.064

Na, Ca,Ti, Rb, Cs

Feldspars: sanidine, orthoclase, microcline (K,Na)[AlSi3O8], albite NaAlSi3O8, anortite CaAl2Si2O8,
Ba-feldspar BaAl2Si2O8

Na+ - 0.098; K+ -0.133; Al3+ -0.057; Si4+ -0.039

Rb, Cs, Tl, Ca, Pb, Fe3+

sphene (titanite) CaTiSiO5

Ca2+ - 0.104; Ti4+ -0.064; Si4+ -0.039

Na, K, Sr, Ln, An

Garnets
Me32+Me23+(SiO4)3

Mg2+ -0.074;Ca2+ -0.104; Fe2+ -0.080;Mn2+ -0.091; Si4+ -0.039

Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni,

Perovskite (CaTiO3)

Ca2+ - 0.104; Ti4+ -0.064;

Nb, Th, Fe, Ta, Ln, Na, Sr, Y

Zircinolite (CaZrTi2O7)

Ca2+ - 0.104; Ti4+ -0.064; Zr4+ - 0.082

Ln, An, Nb, Sc, Y, Hf

Hollandites AB8O16
A= Na, K, Rb, Cs, Sr, Ba, Pb;
B= Co, Ni, Al, Fe, Cr, Si, Ti, Mn, etc.
Ba-hollandite BaAl2Ti6O16

Ba2+ - 0.138, Al3+ -0.057, Na+ - 0.098; K+ -0.133;
Rb+ - 0.149; Cs+ - 0.165; Sr2+ -0.120;Pb2+ - 0.126; Co2+ -0.078;Ni2+ - 0.074; Fe3+ -0.067;Cr3+ - 0.064; Mn2+ -0.091; Si4+ -0.039; Ti4+ -0.064

Na, K, Rb, Cs, Sr, Ba, Ra, Ti, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Mo, Pb, Bi, Ag

Pyrochlore NaCaNb2O6 (OH,F)
Microlite NaCaTa2O6 (OH, F)

Na+ - 0.098;Ca2+ - 0.104; Nb5+ -0.066;Ta5+ - 0.066

Na, Y, Ln, An, Ti, Nb, Ta, W, Cl, I

Apatite Ca5(PO4)3(OH,F,Cl,O); and related phases
Ca10-xLnx(PO4)5-x (SiO4)xO;
Ca5-xLnx(PO4)3-x(SiO4)x(OH,F,Cl,I)

Ca2+ - 0.104; P5+ - 0.035;
F- - 0.133; Cl- - 0.181;
O2- - 0.136; OH- - 0.153

Na, Sr, Ln, An, S, I, Y, Mn

Zircon ZrSiO4

Zr4+ - 0.082, Si4+ - 0.039

Ln, An, Nb, Ta, Hf

Murataite Zr(Ca,Mg)2(Fe,Al)4Ti3O16
Uhligite Ca3Ti5.55Al1.8Zr1.6O20

Ca2+ -0.104;Mg2+ -0.074; Al3+ -0.057; Fe3+ -0.067; Ti4+ -0.064; Zr4+ - 0.082

Na, Ca, Al, Ti, Mn, Fe, Ni, Ln (Ce, Nd), An (U)

 

Works on rock-type wasteforms were started at Radon in 1990. Preparation method was chosen to be high frequency melting in the cold crucible where Radon is greatly experienced. Since 1994 works are performed in cooperation with IGEM RAS.

Step 1 of work on Synroc-type materials had original purpose to prove formation of the Synroc-type ceramics at the cold crucible melting. Using melting in both resistive furnace and the cold crucible the Synroc-type material has been obtained. It contained hollandite, zirconolite, perovskite, and rutile as major phases, and powellite CaMoO4, hibonite/loveringite CaAl12O19, and CAT-phase as minor phases. The material obtained was examined with optical microscopy, SEM/TEM, EMPA. No cracking and elevated leaching were found after fast neutron irradiation of the melted Synroc-C to dose 4× 1018 nvt. These investigations were carried out in cooperation with ANSTO and IGEM RAS [7,8].

The purpose of step 2 was development of Synroc formulation to immobilize PA "Mayak" HLW compositions. This work was also performed in cooperation with ANSTO and IGEM RAS.

Two Synroc formulations for immobilization of source HLW and actinide-rare earth fraction of partitioned HLW have been designed. To immobilize non-partitioned HLW conventional Synroc-C formulation containing 20 wt.% calcined HLW was used. Material was produced by hot-pressing at ANSTO and through melting at Radon. Major phases were found to be zirconolite, hollandite, rutile, and perovskite. In the hot-pressed sample minor metal alloy was also revealed.

In the melted Synroc, containing simulated partitioned HLW the same major phases were found, but minor phases were zirconia, celsian, and murataite (Ca2.65U0.3Ce0.2)(Ti7.3Mn0.6Zr0.4Al0.3)O20 or (in wt%): 59.8 TiO2; 15.6 CaO; 7.0 UO2; 5.6 ZrO2; 4.7 MnO; 4.1 Ce2O3; 1.8 Al2O3. The latter phase concentrates uranium, especially in the central parts of grains. Uranium content in the core reached ~12 wt.% whereas uranium content in the rim was lower than 1 wt.% (~0.8 %) only. Murataite, whose content in the sample was about 1-2%, concentrated up to ~41 wt.% of total uranium in the sample whereas zirconolite (~30-40 vol.% in the sample) contained 52 wt.% U. Summary of waste elements partitioning among co-existing phases in the Synroc doped with simulated Russian HLW are given in Table VI.

Table VI. Element distribution in the sample of melted Synroc (fraction of total, %).

Phase

Na

Al

Si

K

Ca

Ti

Cr

Mn

Fe

Ni

Zr

Ba

Ce

U

Zirconolite

-

18

2

1

65

38

89

30

55

21

94

<1

58

52

Hollandite

47

56

4

78

1

43

9

33

33

78

1

92

1

4

Rutile

-

<1

<1

<1

<1

8

-

<1

-

-

2

-

-

1

Perovskite

-

<1

<1

<1

20

5

1

8

-

-

<1

1

19

1

Murataite

1

2

1

<1

9

5

<1

14

5

1

2

<1

21

41

Glass

52

23

92

20

4

1

-

15

7

-

<1

6

1

1

 

Currently Synroc melting tests are carried out using bench-scale facility with high frequency generator operated at 1.76 MHz and vibrating power 60 kW. The plant is equipped with batch preparation and feeding unit, melt pouring and cast annealing unit, and off-gas system.

Step 3 was devoted to development of the cold crucible melting of zirconolite/pyrochlore-rich ceramics. We synthesized zirconolite-rich ceramics containing U4+ (Pu4+ analog) and Gd3+ (Pu3+ and Cm3+ analog) by means of both the cold crucible inductive melting and cold pressing+sintering. Up to 50 wt% UO2 (Synroc-F formulation) or 30 wt% Gd2O3 were incorporated in synthetic zirconolite/pyrochlore.

As far as materials for plutonium immobilization are concerned, the most promising host phases for Pu immobilization are believed to be zirconolite and pyrochlore. Monoclinic zirconolite structure transforms into cubic pyrochlore structure when Pu3+ content exceeds 0.4 formula units in the Ca site and Pu4+ content exceeds 0.15 formula units in the Zr site [9]. The latter case corresponds to ~11 wt% 239PuO2.

Another hosts suggested for actinide immobilization are murataite, zircon, cubic zirconia, sphene (titanite), aechynite/ euxenite (REE,Th,U,Ca)(Ti,Nb,Ta,Fe3+)2O6, brannerite UTi2O6, monazite, synthetic analogs of apatite and related phases (silicophosphates), NZP ceramics and analogs, borosilicate glass, phosphate glass.

TECHNOLOGICAL RESEARCHES

Technological researches comprises

The cold crucible melting process is being currently developed for both LILW vitrification [2,3] and HLW immobilization in Synroc and other ceramic and glass-ceramic materials. The plasma arc melting process is mainly designed for solidification of high-fusible solid low-level, mixed, and hazardous wastes. The integrated plasma treatment-inductive melting process is under development now for processing of unsorted solid waste whose chemical composition and morphology are widely varied. In the whole, general concept, accepted at SIA Radon, is to transform all the radioactive wastes to stable glass-like or ceramic wasteforms suitable for long-term storage and able to be transported to regional repositories. From this point of view, processes with liquid slagging are the most promising.

Radon has numerous facilities including resistive furnaces for lab-scale investigations (up to ~1 kg of batch), bench-scale facility (1-10 kg of batch) based on the cold crucible (up to 10-20 kg/h), industrial-scale facility (10-50 kg of batch) based on the cold crucible (up to 30 kg/h), bench-scale facility for plasma torch melting (up to 10-20 kg/h), industrial-scale vitrification plant (up to 75 kg/h) for production of glass blocks each of ~25-30 kg.

FUTURE WORKS

Future works will be directed to development and testing of appropriate wasteforms for HLW and actinide-bearing waste immobilization (Synroc, zirconolite/pyrochlore-rich ceramics, other crystalline materials), and further development of the cold crucible and plasma technologies for waste conditioning. R&D program includes:

As far as plutonium immobilization is concerned, works are supposed to be as follows:

REFERENCES

  1. I.A. Sobolev, L.M. KHOMTCHIK, "Management of Radioactive Wastes at Centralized Sites," Moscow (1983).
  2. I.A. Sobolev, S.A. Dmitriev, F.A. Lifanov, S.V. Stefanovsky, A.P. Kobelev, "Low- and Intermediate-Level Waste Vitrification: Basic Principles, Process Units and Product Characterization," WM95. HLW, LLW, Mixed Wastes and Environmental Restoration - Working Towards A Cleaner Environment. Tucson. 1995. Abstracts. P.12. CD ROM.
  3. I.A. Sobolev, S.A. Dmitriev, H.A. Turlak, F.A. Lifanov, S.V. Stefanovsky, A.P. Kobelev, M.I. Ojovan, "SIA Radon Experience in Radioactive Waste Vitrification," Moscow, Enomar (1996).
  4. N.P. Laverov, B.I. Omelyanenko, S.V.Yudintsev, B.S. Nikonov, I.A. Sobolev, S.V. Stefanovsky, "Mineralogy and Geochemistry of Matrices for the Immobilization of High Level Radioactive Wastes," Geology of Ore Deposits 39 (1997) 179.
  5. W. Eitel, "The Physical Chemistry of the Silicates," Chicago (1954).
  6. T.N. Lashtchenova, F.A. Lifanov, S.V. Stefanovsky, "Incorporation of Radon Incinerator Ash in Glass and Glass Crystalline Materials," WM97. HLW, LLW, Mixed Wastes and Environmental Restoration - Working Towards A Cleaner Environment. Tucson. 1997. CD ROM.
  7. S. Stefanovsky, E.R. Vance, R.A. Day, B.D. Begg, "Melting and Ceramic Routes to Synroc," PacRim2. The 2nd International Meeting of Pacific Rim Ceramic Societies, Abstract. P.A145 (1996).
  8. O.A. Knyazev, B.S. Nikonov, B.I. Omelianenko, S.V. Stefanovsky, S.V. Yudintsev, R.A. Day, E.R. Vance, "Preparation and Characterization of Inductively-Melted Synroc," Spectrum '96. Proceedings. International Topical Meeting on Nuclear and Hazardous Waste Management, Seattle, WA, 1996. P. 2130-2137.
  9. E.R. Vance, A. Jostsons, R.A. Day, C.J. Ball, B.D. Begg, P.J. Angel, "Excess Pu Disposition in Zirconolite-Rich Synroc," Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 412 (1996) 41.

BACK