SECONDARY WASTE PROBLEM IN SURFACE FLOW
DECONTAMINATION FROM RADIONUCLIDES
Yurii Karlin, Vadim Iljin, Olga Karlina, Vladimir Kropotov, Elena Kropotova,
Yurii Slastennikov., Igor Sobolev
Moscow state enterprise - MosNPO "Radon"
The 7-th Rostovsky Lane, 2/14, Moscow, 119121, Russia,
Tel. (095)2481680, Fax (095)2481941, Email: root@nporadon.msk.ru
ABSTRACT
In decontamination of surface flow from factories exploiting open radiation sources not only technical difficulties emerge but economical as well. Significant amounts of secondary radioactive waste result from treatment of huge water bulk with extremely low levels of radioactivity with the use of water purification facilities. It should be emphasized that specific activity of such secondary waste does not usually allow to classify it as radioactive waste but in spite of this fact they require isolation from populated regions by radiation hygiene standards as they are carriers of raised radiation background. In present report based on operating experience obtained at MosNPO "Radon" amount of secondary radioactive waste resulting from surface flow decontamination by the various methods is evaluated. Difficulties emerging in development of low-level radioactive secondary waste management technology are described as well.
INTRODUCTION
Moscow state enterprise (MosNPO "Radon") is a regional storage of radioactive waste (RW) [1-2]. Considering specifics of production cycle of similar enterprises, it is possible to select three main types of waters, subjecting for clean-up, as follows:
It is obvious that LLLRW volumes of the first and second type should be shorten by treatment in water-cleaning plants or changing the technological operations with RW, causing the LLLRW formation. It is more difficult to find economically acceptable ways, leading to shorten the volumes of the third type RW.
In this paper a system for the deep cleaning of surface flows from radionuclides, characterized with the minimum volume of secondary RW is offered. This system was developed on the base of practical experience, received at MosNPO "Radon".
WHY THE PROBLEM OF SURFACE FLOW DECONTAMINATION IS URGENT
Surface flows from the RW disposal site of Zagorsk branch of MosNPO "Radon" are characterized by the following factors:
Given data show that the chemical composition of surface flows water corresponds to the natural one, in spite of that the share of ground infiltrating water in them does not exceed 20-30%. Contamination levels of water with radionuclides are much below the most-possible concentrations, defined by radiation safety rates [3], acting in Russia. So water of surface flows is not referred as liquid radwaste.
However, even such low concentrations of radionuclides in the surface flows bring about their accumulation in natural objects of the coastal part drainage system (ground, vegetation, bestial organisms) [1]. Evaluation of polluted ground volume, depending on used radiation danger criteria, which are far from unambiguous, brings about values from 5000 m3 up to 30000 m3. Herewith, it should be noted that as for the specific contents of radionuclides the polluted grounds (with the exclusion of separate areas, which contribution does not exceed 1%) do not get under the category of solid radioactive waste, which are defined by the sanitary rules for radioactive waste treatment (SPORO-85) [4]. The single All-Russia legislative document, which recommendations following it is possible to classify a territory polluted with radionuclides, is Exhibit P-5 in NRB-96 [3] about criterion of interference on polluted territories. According to that document an interference level is determined by the radiation level influence more than 0,3 mZv/a (or excess of gamma-background rate above natural one for 3,4 mR/h). It is necessary to note that even these standards carry a reference nature.
Problem of territory, adjoining to radwaste disposal site, pollution is solvable by the surface flows cleaning up to radionuclides concentrations close to natural ones. The concept of surface flows cleaning , which is realized in MosNPO "Radon" at present, is described in [2] and uses multibarriers principle:
The planned engineering constructions are already partly realized. Pond-settlers were put into usage in 1990. From 1995 a mobile module complex "Aqua-Express" is used, in which to autumn of 1997 more than 1000 m3 radioactive water were cleaned. From 1996 start-up and assembling works on intended for the surface flows after pond-settlers post-cleaning stationary plant "Crystal" are led. The first queue of plant "Crystal" consists of the unit for the surface flows cleaning from oils on a stringy hydrofobous material and floated loading of granulated polypropilen.
COST OF LLLRW CLEANING ON ORDINARY FACILITY USING OF SORBENTS
The usage of plant "Aqua-Express" (Fig.1) has shown that cost of LLLRW cleaning (with initial total specific activity up to 2000 Bk/l of beta-nuclides and up to 100 Bk/l of alpha-nuclides) with the chemical composition, close to the surface flows, up to the levels, corresponding the radiation safety rates (in MosNPO "Radon" checking levels - 10 Bk/l for beta-nuclides and 1 Bk/l for alpha-nuclides), with the following overflow of purified water into the drainage system forms aproximately 70-80$ US per 1 m3 of LLLRW (Table.1). Herewith, the volume of secondary radwaste, subjecting to disposal, is aproximately 1%.
Fig. 1. Principle technological scheme of plant <Aqua-Express>: 1 - LLLRW tank, 2 - filter-container with selective to 137Cs sorbent, 3 - peristaltic pump, 4 - filter with anion exchange resin, 5 -filter with clinoptilolite and cation exchange resin, 6 - filter with cation exchange resin, 7 - centrifugal pump, 8 - roll ultrafiltration devices, 9 - manometers, 10 - intermediate tank.
Table I. Main expenses for 430 m3 LLLRW cleaning in the plant "Aqua-Express"
Consumable Utility |
Demand (up to) |
Cost, $US per unit |
Total Cost, $US |
1. Electricity |
4500 kWh |
$0.13/kWh |
585$ US |
2. Metal Drums for Cementation |
24 pcs |
$60.00/pcs |
1440$ US |
3. Filter-container with Sorbent «Fenix-A» (selective to 137Cs) |
1 pcs |
$500.00/pcs |
500$ US |
4. Ultrafiltration Spiral Membrane Elements |
5 pcs |
$450.00/pcs |
2250$ US |
5. Cement |
3000 kg |
$0.15/kg |
450$ US |
6. Sorbent «Fenix-A» |
30 kg |
$25.00/kg |
750$ US |
7. Clinoptilolite |
200 kg |
$0.30/kg |
60$ US |
8. Cation-exchange resin |
600 kg |
$8.00/kg |
4800$ US |
9. Anion-exchange resin |
1400 kg |
$12.00/kg |
16800$ US |
10. Amortization from Cost of Facilities («Aqua-Express») |
2% |
40000.00$ US |
800$ US |
Service of Facilities («Aqua-Express») |
800 Man-hour |
$6.00/Man-hour |
4800$ US |
Total: |
|
|
33235$ US |
|
|
|
|
Cost of Cleaning LLLRW per 1 m3 |
|
|
77.29$ US |
It is obvious that the surface flows cleaning in a similar plant with close technological parameters will cause formation of 1200-1300 m3 secondary radwaste per annum. This is a very great amount of secondary waste comparable to the volume of RW, enterring in MosNPO "Radon" for disposal from other organizations. However, it is characterized vastly more low contamination levels.
Disposal cost of 1 m3 RW according to different evaluations forms from 3000$ US up to 5000$ US. It is not difficult to evaluate the total current expenses for the surface flows post-cleaning, which will form from expenses for water purification, expenses for the secondary radwaste disposal, and expenses for the stuff, conducting the specified works. For MosNPO "Radon" total expenses for the surface flows clearing are valued up to 20,000,000$ US per annum.
Such great expenses require a sharp increasing in the enterprise budget, nearly reduplications of its production powers on the RW conditioning and significant increasing in the disposal site. In the current term with provision for limited financing of similar enterprises and as a whole negative public opinion to the expansion of areas, chosen for necessities of atomic energy, undertaking of the specified actions is presented impossible.
HOW TO OBTAIN THE LOW COST OF SURFACE FLOW DECONTAMINATION
Study of possibilities for surface flows clearing costs shortenning has shown that for this it is required to use sorbents in tens times cheaper, than synthetical ones (ion-exchange resins, selective inorganic sorbents), as well as sharply to reduce the volume of secondary waste, directed to the disposal site. The latter is reached by the increase of radionuclides concentrating in the final carrier.
The studies directed on the revision of physicochemical forms, in which radionuclides migrate together with the surface flows from pond-settlers into the sanitary-defensive area of enterprise, have shown that a great part of radionuclides migrates on fine clay particles and particles of silts of submicro sizes. This is indicated by:
Fig. 2. Dependence of 238Pu contents in ground of flood plain drainage system of MosNPO "Radon" from the 137Cs contents.
Comparative data on some natural object sorption abilities (clay particles, water vegetation, microorganisms) and industrial synthetic sorbents (ion-exchange resins, inorganic selective sorbents), provided in Table II, have confirmed high sorption characteristics of clay particles and silts for radionuclides of the surface flows at MosNPO "Radon".
Table 2. Distribution factors of radionuclides between some sorbents and simulated solution, prepared from water of surface flows (ml/g)
Sorbent |
137 Cs |
90 Sr |
Cation-exchange resins |
||
KU-2x8 |
2100 |
105000 |
Natural zeolites |
||
Mordenite |
2000 |
160 |
Vermiculite |
600 |
24 |
Clinoptilolite |
18000 |
1100 |
Synthetical inorganic sorbents |
||
ISMA-3 |
290 |
37000 |
FS-2 |
10500 |
150 |
NGA |
25000 |
145 |
Charcoal adsorbents |
||
BAU |
60 |
1300 |
Microorganisms |
||
Aspergillus niger |
810 |
1250 |
Trichoderma resei |
430 |
1100 |
Candida tropical |
1500 |
115 |
Endomicopsis fitulis |
560 |
34 |
Water plants |
||
Elodea canadensis |
1800 |
2400* |
Lemna minor |
9000 |
3200* |
Cladophora glomerata |
7200 |
3800* |
Leptodictium riparium |
5400 |
- |
Clay particles and silts |
||
Clay particles and silts |
3000 - 7500 |
20 - 200** |
* - data received from [5] and ** - from [6].
Distribution factor of radionuclide Kd was calculated according to the equation:
where A0 and A¥ - initial and final specific activities of simulated solution, V - simulated solution volume (ml), m - weight of air-dry sorbent or ground or burnt to ash biomass (g) at the temperature 400-500° C.
Found particularities of the surface flows contamination by radionuclides allow to offer a technological scheme of plant for the surface flows after pond-settlers post-cleaning, in which high-priced synthetic sorbents are not used (Fig.3).
Fig. 3. Principle technological scheme of plant <Crystal>: 1 - pond-settlers, 2 - pump, 3 - filter with hydrofobous stringy material and granulated polypropilen, 4 - sand filter, 5 - plate separator, 6 - intermediate tank, 7 - pump, 8 - roll ultrafiltration devices.
Preliminary cost estimations for the surface flows cleaning without using the sorbents bring about values from 2$ US up to 10$ US for 1 m3 of cleaned water that is in 7-40 times lower than in plants, using synthetic sorbents. On evaluations the amount of secondary waste from water purification only from clay particles will form from 30000 kg up to 50000 kg per annum or from 15 m3 up to 34 m3 by volume. Such low amounts of the secondary waste will not changed greatly the total volume of radwaste, disposed in MosNPO "Radon". Total expenses for the surface flows cleaning are decreased up to values not more than 1,500,000$ US per annum.
In 1998 field tests of the pilot plant for the surface flows cleaning without using the sorbents with production up to 200 l/h are scheduled, which will allow to specify the done evaluations of cost for the surface flows post-cleaning at MosNPO "Radon".
REFERENCES